<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Creative Commons Sampling License</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/02/28/the-creative-commons-sampling-license/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/02/28/the-creative-commons-sampling-license/</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/02/28/the-creative-commons-sampling-license/comment-page-1/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Mar 2005 19:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/02/28/the-creative-commons-sampling-license/#comment-382</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s great that you note this, Dave...but I (or anyone else) would still be (explicitly, no less) violating your copyright if I passed a copy of a great download on to someone else. Is that what you want? Because I respect copyright, and I&#039;ll refrain from doing it...and you&#039;ll net LOSE referrals from me. That just doesn&#039;t make sense intuitively to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s great that you note this, Dave&#8230;but I (or anyone else) would still be (explicitly, no less) violating your copyright if I passed a copy of a great download on to someone else. Is that what you want? Because I respect copyright, and I&#8217;ll refrain from doing it&#8230;and you&#8217;ll net LOSE referrals from me. That just doesn&#8217;t make sense intuitively to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

