<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marantz PMD660</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-88739</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-88739</guid>
		<description>Got a sweet deal with balance microphones http://www.martelelectronics.com/1231.html. I needed to record a large group conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a sweet deal with balance microphones <a href="http://www.martelelectronics.com/1231.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.martelelectronics.com/1231.html</a>. I needed to record a large group conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerry Taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-81938</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 14:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-81938</guid>
		<description>Could not recommend the Marantz 670. I purchased two for my oral history program. Both lock up when recording with 2GB CF Cards (have tried PNY and SANDISK cards). I have to unplug the machine to power down. Returned machines for servicing several times. They can&#039;t find a problem. Works &quot;fine&quot; for them. 

The 512MB cards (Lexar) seem to work ok, but gives you only 1.5 hours of digital recording. I&#039;ve had it. I&#039;m basically out $1,500. Thanks Marantz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not recommend the Marantz 670. I purchased two for my oral history program. Both lock up when recording with 2GB CF Cards (have tried PNY and SANDISK cards). I have to unplug the machine to power down. Returned machines for servicing several times. They can&#8217;t find a problem. Works &#8220;fine&#8221; for them. </p>
<p>The 512MB cards (Lexar) seem to work ok, but gives you only 1.5 hours of digital recording. I&#8217;ve had it. I&#8217;m basically out $1,500. Thanks Marantz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-42158</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-42158</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Allessandro. XLR or 1/4&quot; TRS balanced inputs are certainly better than 1/8&quot; but I certainly wouldn&#039;t go with the PMD-660 in any case. I have one, and I don&#039;t particularly like it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Allessandro. XLR or 1/4&#8243; TRS balanced inputs are certainly better than 1/8&#8243; but I certainly wouldn&#8217;t go with the PMD-660 in any case. I have one, and I don&#8217;t particularly like it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-42135</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-42135</guid>
		<description>I mean, Fostex FR-2LE for 90$ more adds this feature and has the same quality of the pmd620 seems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mean, Fostex FR-2LE for 90$ more adds this feature and has the same quality of the pmd620 seems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-42134</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-42134</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the answer but let me ask again: isn&#039;t it better to get a recorder that use a XLR hi quality microphone - if i don&#039;t get it wrong, the PMD620 can&#039;t mount one, right?

total newbie here btw :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the answer but let me ask again: isn&#8217;t it better to get a recorder that use a XLR hi quality microphone &#8211; if i don&#8217;t get it wrong, the PMD620 can&#8217;t mount one, right?</p>
<p>total newbie here btw <img src='http://www.blogarithms.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-41965</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-41965</guid>
		<description>Alessandro, I would *definitely* copnsider the new PMD620 over the PMD660. The PMD620 is newer, less expensive and has received good early reviews. I&#039;ve played with one but to the extent that I can recommend it with hand-on knowledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alessandro, I would *definitely* copnsider the new PMD620 over the PMD660. The PMD620 is newer, less expensive and has received good early reviews. I&#8217;ve played with one but to the extent that I can recommend it with hand-on knowledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alessandro</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-41957</link>
		<dc:creator>Alessandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-41957</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the infos! 

I would like resume this topic as i&#039;m about to buy a solid state recorder, and here i am in the middle of a tough decision: is the marantz pmd660 still a good choiche? 

It&#039;s been like 3 years since it&#039;s release, and i&#039;m afraid Marantz or another company will release a new, substancially better, SSRecorder with XLR mics usage in a not too distant future.

Would you recommend me this purchase even today?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the infos! </p>
<p>I would like resume this topic as i&#8217;m about to buy a solid state recorder, and here i am in the middle of a tough decision: is the marantz pmd660 still a good choiche? </p>
<p>It&#8217;s been like 3 years since it&#8217;s release, and i&#8217;m afraid Marantz or another company will release a new, substancially better, SSRecorder with XLR mics usage in a not too distant future.</p>
<p>Would you recommend me this purchase even today?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Recognizing 4Gb is good news. 

    I have read about the noise issues a little bit, but I do not recall the best source that I ran across. I googled it, so you might do the same. The conclusion was that dynamic mics will no be satisfactory while condenders will be fine unless you record at low volume. You might take a look at this forum:

http://www.oade.com/Tapers_Section/Forum/dcboard.php

    People here are knowledgeable. Oade already has a fix for noisy preamps for the PMD670, and will see if anything can be done with the PMD660 &quot;in April.&quot;

    My personal workhorse is the Sonifex Courier. It is an excellent tool, but it is too big and I need smaller, cheaper and more convenient batteries with long battery life, like AAs.

    I will also try laptop recording using Digigram&#039;s PCMCIA card and a Fujitsu P7010 laptop, but that is also too bulky and cumbersome.

    I suspect there is a market for devices like the PMD660, and I agree that the device is not worth much more than 300-400. The no moving parts aspect of it is very attractive. I think I will hold off for now, at least until the noise issue is better investigated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recognizing 4Gb is good news. </p>
<p>    I have read about the noise issues a little bit, but I do not recall the best source that I ran across. I googled it, so you might do the same. The conclusion was that dynamic mics will no be satisfactory while condenders will be fine unless you record at low volume. You might take a look at this forum:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oade.com/Tapers_Section/Forum/dcboard.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.oade.com/Tapers_Section/Forum/dcboard.php</a></p>
<p>    People here are knowledgeable. Oade already has a fix for noisy preamps for the PMD670, and will see if anything can be done with the PMD660 &#8220;in April.&#8221;</p>
<p>    My personal workhorse is the Sonifex Courier. It is an excellent tool, but it is too big and I need smaller, cheaper and more convenient batteries with long battery life, like AAs.</p>
<p>    I will also try laptop recording using Digigram&#8217;s PCMCIA card and a Fujitsu P7010 laptop, but that is also too bulky and cumbersome.</p>
<p>    I suspect there is a market for devices like the PMD660, and I agree that the device is not worth much more than 300-400. The no moving parts aspect of it is very attractive. I think I will hold off for now, at least until the noise issue is better investigated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-453</guid>
		<description>My 4GB CF card arrived yesterday, and at first I freaked out that it only appeared as a 2GB card. Turns out it has a partitioning switch, and once I moved it to the full-card position, the PMD660 saw a full 4GB. It&#039;s a SanDisk CF card.

BTW, I do have one complaint with the PMD660, shared with others with whom I&#039;ve communicated: The mic preamps seem particularly noisy, and I don&#039;t know why. I also have a direct-to-CD recorder by Marantz (a CDR300) and its preamps are much better. As the PMD660&#039;s manual suggests, I recommend only using a high-output mic like a condenser. A low-output dynamic mic may not give you a good enough s/n ratio. Although I still like th PMD660, it&#039;s not nearly as good a value as the CDR300. The latter costs a few hundred dollars more, but it&#039;s a much more substantial unit. While the PMD660 is &quot;competitively&quot; priced, I think the ultimate value of such devices is closer to $300 than to the $499 I paid for it. Particularly when I also had to shell out $300 for a 4GB CF card. That&#039;s an $800 solution. Sure makes my Sony HD minidisc recorders look and sound real good. If the MDs had a USB or FireWire interface, I&#039;d buy one of them before I&#039;d by the PMD660. The Sony MD has better s/n, a much better ALC/AGC circuit, and at a much lower cost when ou include reusable media.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My 4GB CF card arrived yesterday, and at first I freaked out that it only appeared as a 2GB card. Turns out it has a partitioning switch, and once I moved it to the full-card position, the PMD660 saw a full 4GB. It&#8217;s a SanDisk CF card.</p>
<p>BTW, I do have one complaint with the PMD660, shared with others with whom I&#8217;ve communicated: The mic preamps seem particularly noisy, and I don&#8217;t know why. I also have a direct-to-CD recorder by Marantz (a CDR300) and its preamps are much better. As the PMD660&#8242;s manual suggests, I recommend only using a high-output mic like a condenser. A low-output dynamic mic may not give you a good enough s/n ratio. Although I still like th PMD660, it&#8217;s not nearly as good a value as the CDR300. The latter costs a few hundred dollars more, but it&#8217;s a much more substantial unit. While the PMD660 is &#8220;competitively&#8221; priced, I think the ultimate value of such devices is closer to $300 than to the $499 I paid for it. Particularly when I also had to shell out $300 for a 4GB CF card. That&#8217;s an $800 solution. Sure makes my Sony HD minidisc recorders look and sound real good. If the MDs had a USB or FireWire interface, I&#8217;d buy one of them before I&#8217;d by the PMD660. The Sony MD has better s/n, a much better ALC/AGC circuit, and at a much lower cost when ou include reusable media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/comment-page-1/#comment-452</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2005/03/23/marantz-pmd660/#comment-452</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the encouraging comments on the PMD 660. I just discovered it accidentally in the last three days, and I&#039;m already in the market to buy it. I&#039;ve had unhappy experiences with the Sonifex Courier, MD recorders and other implements, and this device seems to have answered all of my concerns.

   Have you actually verified that the 660 actually records to the entire 4Gb of the 4Gb card, and not just the first 2Gb? I would really prefer to pick up a 4Gb CF card with this recorder, but I have not spotted a positive confirmation of this little detail.
    You might or might not know there is also a wired remote available for this recorder. It&#039;s about $80 and has a couple of nifty options.

Alex</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the encouraging comments on the PMD 660. I just discovered it accidentally in the last three days, and I&#8217;m already in the market to buy it. I&#8217;ve had unhappy experiences with the Sonifex Courier, MD recorders and other implements, and this device seems to have answered all of my concerns.</p>
<p>   Have you actually verified that the 660 actually records to the entire 4Gb of the 4Gb card, and not just the first 2Gb? I would really prefer to pick up a 4Gb CF card with this recorder, but I have not spotted a positive confirmation of this little detail.<br />
    You might or might not know there is also a wired remote available for this recorder. It&#8217;s about $80 and has a couple of nifty options.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

