Interviewed for ACM’s Ubiquity
Ubiquity, a magazine and forum from the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) has just posted an interview with me conducted by John Gehl.
Doug Kaye’s Weblog
Ubiquity, a magazine and forum from the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) has just posted an interview with me conducted by John Gehl.
(Hear the MP3 version with additional commentary in beautiful monophonic audio.)
New Programs Last Week
Here are the programs we’ve published in the last week, ranked in increasing order of listener ratings.
The O’Reilly Pick of the Week:
This week’s IT Conversations/O’Reilly Pick of the Week is from 2004:
We tried to pull off a video TWiT on Friday, but the Gods of travel conspired against us. Today, however, Leo Laporte was able to pull together a quorum and hosted a great show with me, John C. Dvorak and Patrick Norton. Hope you enjoy it.
Marc Canter, co-founder and initial funder of Ourmedia.org has posted his personal comments about the web site’s first year of operation. Although I have been an advisor to Ourmedia.org — my name appears as Audio scout, whatever that means — I’m not at all close to its innerworkings, and I consider both Marc and co-founder J.D. Lasica to be good friends. I’m not qualified to comment directly on Marc’s post with regard to Ourmedia.org, but I think he makes some very important points for similar sites including IT Conversations and The Conversations Network. So in response:
On volunteer labor. I agree wholeheartedly with Marc about the fact that you need to pay people if you want to get something done. You can’t depend on volunteers for important stuff, which is one reason why we now pay the postproduction team at The Conversations Network. We always have, in fact, starting with the distribution of the old Tip Jar from Day One, back on April 1, 2005. We can’t afford to pay a lot, but it’s in keeping with the importance of what we do. It’s not as critical as a the activities of a broadcast station or a newspaper when it comes to schedule, but it’s more important than “whenever.”
However (!) volunteers are an excellent way to gauge the passion behind a project, and some projects should indeed die if there aren’t enough passionate volunteers to make them happen. As we roll out our grassroots portion of The Conversations Network, we intend to pay for the development of the software (an infrastructure cost), but not for the producers, engineers and writers. If no one is interested in producing a particular program as a volunteer, that says a lot about its value to our listeners.
Federated IDs are the way to go. Absolutely true. In the new site for The Conversations Network, a disproportionate amout of code, time and debugging went into (and still goes into) the single-signon sytem that couples Wordpress, punBB and our custom code. Ugly stuff.
Make sure to make it clear what you expect from investing almost $100,000 into something. Absolutely the case. Perhaps the good news is that no one here had that kind of money to invest in The Conversations Network. Although I and the other managers are essentially working for free — which I admit is unrealistic in the long term — we’ve achieved financial stability for the medium term. We’re about to expand into three or four new channels in April, and the general guideline is that each of them has to be self-sustaining through underwritings, and by the end of this year, I expect those volunteer managers will become paid part-time contractors.
All of us in “new media,” particularly in the non-profit space have a lot to learn, and hopefully we can continue to share the experiences from our successes as well as from our mistakes and our failures.
We’re taping a video edition of the awesome Leo Laporte’s This Week in Tech on Friday night. Looks so far like me, Leo, John C. Dvorak and Robert Heron. Not sure who else from the usual TWiTs.
Got any topics you want me to take to the TWiTs, all of whom are much smarter and more tuned-in than I?
March 28 is now set as the date for our quarterly conference call with The Conversations Network Executive Producers, managers and Patron and Benefactor members. If you’d like to hear our plans and give your feedback directly to our staff and producers, now’s a great time to join the network.
Co-founder J.D. Lasica reports that after just one year, Ourmedia has 87,000 members and about 150,000 works of personal media that people have uploaded — video, audio, photos and more. They have also launched a preliminary Digital Media Learning Center and have ambitious plans for the rest of the site.
We’ve extended the deadline for the $50 early registration discount for the Podcast Academy at Boston University until April 1, 2006.
(Hear the MP3 version with additional commentary in beautiful monophonic audio.)
New Programs Last Week
Here are the programs we’ve published in the last week, ranked in increasing order of listener ratings.
The O’Reilly Pick of the Week:
This week’s IT Conversations/O’Reilly Pick of the Week is from 2004:
I’d like to extend my apologies to the listeners of The Conversations Network and IT Conversations for some glitches in our audio programs over the past four weeks. On February 18 we launched ASM, our new automated show-assembly system that allows us to rebuild all of our audio programs from components on a nightly basis. New programs and series that were produced using ASM are coming out fine, but some of the earlier programs that were produced partially using the new tools and partially using traditional techniques have been plagued by occasional problems such as portions of shows that either don’t play back on certain players or that play back incorrectly such as at double speed.
If you encounter a problem, first go back to the IT Conversations web site and download the program again. It could well be that we’ve fixed the program since your first download. If it’s still not correct, please email me directly at doug@rds.com. I promise we’ll fix and publish the show promptly.
We’ve had an embargo on admitting new audio engineers into our apprenticeship program while we debugged our new automated show-assembly system. Now that that’s done and working well, we’re ready to ramp up our post-production volume as we plan for new channels in The Conversations Network next month.
If you’d like to join The Conversations Network team as a part-time post-production audio engineer, and if you really do have the skills, experience and required software, just go to our volunteer signup page and tell us a bit about yourself. It won’t make your rich, but it’s pretty good beer money.
An important member Team ITC, Dorothy Yamamoto, has just been diagnosed with leukemia, and will be hospitalized at the UCLA Medical Center during her tests, chemotherapy and more for at least a month. Dorothy had been feeling week ever since having the flu late in 2005, and had undergone one test after another until getting this diagnosis. In fact, they still don’t know precisely which form of leukemia she has. That’s going to require some gnarly bone-marrow biopsies this week.
You may not know Dorothy by name, but you’d recognize her work, which includes The Conversations Network graphics and the logo for Leo Laporte’s This Week in Tech (TWiT) podcast. Dorothy is a brilliant designer and a huge supporter of The Conversations Network, TWiT and podcasting in general.
Dorothy, we’re all thinking of you and hoping for your rapid recovery.
(Hear the MP3 version with additional commentary in beautiful monophonic audio.)
New Programs Last Week
Here are the programs we’ve published in the last week, ranked in increasing order of listener ratings.
The O’Reilly Pick of the Week:
This week’s IT Conversations/O’Reilly Pick of the Week is from 2004:
Two weeks ago we created the free Guest membership on The Conversations Network, and many of you have signed up to take advantage of it. And hundreds of you are stopping by the IT Conversations Forum to read messages every day. The only problem? Almost no one is bothering to leave a message of their own.
I know the Forums will eventually pick up steam and become popular, but we need your help. Did you hear an IT Conversations program this week that inspired you? Stop by and say so. Disagree with a guest, host or speaker? We want to hear that, too. You can also get there by clicking on the Discuss link on any progam’s deail page.
We’ve just added an affiliates page to The Conversations Network web site. The idea is sort of like “matching grants” in the public-radio world. If you, our loyal listeners, visit the affiliates page, click through to the affiliates’ web sites, and conduct any business, The Conversations Network receives a small payment. Whether or not you can afford to become a paying member of The Conversations Network, the affiliates page is another way you can help us keep user-supported audio on the ‘Net alive.
I was privileged to be part of the team on This Week in Tech today with Leo Laporte, Patrick Norton, Robert Heron, and John C. Dvorak. It’s a much better show than my last appearance, two weeks ago. (MP3)
We’re making some progress towards our goal of being able to capture and publish the slide presentations from conferences along with synchronized audio.
The next question is what is the optimal release format for these videos? We can easily release them as QuickTime movie files, for example. They look great, but they’re still fairly large, on the order of hundreds of megabytes per hour. Any full-motion formats are wasteful, particularly given that these presentations are usually just still images, which don’t change for long periods of time.
Should we release as Flash/Shockwave files? They would be much smaller. Are they compatible with more playback devices and computers? And what tools exist to convert from full-motion video such as H.264 to Flash?
Adam Curry posted a classic edition of the Daily Source Code today in which he tells the story of his recent lawsuit against a Dutch tabloid’s editors. But more than that, he goes into a great deal of personal history as somone trying to do good while in the public eye. The lawsuit, by the way, was over unauthorized use of Adam’s photos posted on Flickr with a Creative Commons License. The program was enough to remind me that I’ve been wanting to post these thoughts about the misunderstandings of copyright and licensing.
As of 1976 (here in the U.S.) anything you write or publish is automatically covered by copyright law. No longer do you have to put that little © symbol on your works, although it does make it clear who the copyright holder is. You don’t need to register your copyighted works unless you want to litigate, and even registration can be deferred until that time. Copyright protects your rights and (supposedly, but no longer very well) the rights of the commons. The latter is an important subject, but not the one I want to address today. For the sake of this discussion, just consider the aspect of copyright that reserves for the copyright holder certain rights.
A license, on the other hand, is a granting to others some of those rights normally reserved for the copyright holder. A license never strengthens your rights to what you’ve created. If anything it weakens those rights by giving something to someone else. The Creative Commons licenses — and there are many varieties — are an attempt to clarify and simplify licensing, particularly in cases where the licensee is anonymous: a person or persons among the commons. A Creative Commons license grants certain rights to individuals or organizations without the copyright holder (the licensor) having a clue as to who those individuals or organizations might be. Creative Commons is a brilliant idea, not only because it allows granting of limited rights to the commons, but because the licenses are generally straightforward and don’t require lawyers or even phone calls to make clear what’s allowed and what isn’t.
Contrary to what Adam suggested, however, I don’t believe his case in The Netherlands is a test of the validity of the Creative Commons licenses. I haven’t read the judge’s opinion — it’s probably in Dutch anyway — but from Adam’s comments it seems to be just a copyright case. Again, the issue here is that a Creative Commons license does nothing to protect a copyright holder from illegal use of his/her intellectual property. If anything, Adam’s rights in his photos would have been more secure had he not opted to publish under a CC license.
So remember, when you publish under any of the Creative Common’s licenses, you’re not providing yourself any additional protection. What you’re doing is granting rights to others.
Update: Looks like people who know more than I do about this (i.e., lawyers) may disagree. A post on Groklaw entitled Creative Commons License Upheld by Dutch Court translates the Dutch ruling. Still, I don’t think this was a legitimate challenge of a CC license. No specific provisions were attacked.
A great book, Podcast Solutions by Michael Geoghegan and Dan Klass, is now being carried in Apple’s stores. What a terrific endorsement! (Disclaimer: I was the Technical Reviewer for this book.)
(Hear the MP3 version with additional commentary in beautiful monophonic audio.)
New Programs Last Week
Here are the programs we’ve published in the last week, ranked in increasing order of listener ratings.
The O’Reilly Pick of the Week:
This week’s IT Conversations/O’Reilly Pick of the Week is from 2004:
Powered by WordPress