<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Filtering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/05/22/spam-filtering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/05/22/spam-filtering/</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: site admin</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/05/22/spam-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-30047</link>
		<dc:creator>site admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 18:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/05/22/spam-filtering/#comment-30047</guid>
		<description>Frank, Spam Assassin is configured rather weakly, so I don&#039;t check there. About once a month I have to fish something out of the Gmail Spam folder. Most of the false positives are from SpamSieve, but that&#039;s just due to my aggressive settings. I still (quickly) review SpamSieve&#039;s positives and use them to further train the algorithm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frank, Spam Assassin is configured rather weakly, so I don&#8217;t check there. About once a month I have to fish something out of the Gmail Spam folder. Most of the false positives are from SpamSieve, but that&#8217;s just due to my aggressive settings. I still (quickly) review SpamSieve&#8217;s positives and use them to further train the algorithm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/05/22/spam-filtering/comment-page-1/#comment-29936</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 14:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/05/22/spam-filtering/#comment-29936</guid>
		<description>I can understand that one must do what one needs to do, but with so many levels of defense where (or how) do you look for false positives? Or maybe you don&#039;t even bother since your inbound volume is so high?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand that one must do what one needs to do, but with so many levels of defense where (or how) do you look for false positives? Or maybe you don&#8217;t even bother since your inbound volume is so high?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

