<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skype for Interviews &#8211; A How-To Video</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Fugere</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-101176</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Fugere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 03:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-101176</guid>
		<description>Doug, Yes, I&#039;ve seen that the SILK_V3 codec works (and very well at that!) for the Skype to Skype calls. However, for the SkypeOut calls, I&#039;m stuck in G729 and cannot see the relays/UDP stats in the technical info screen. I&#039;m just wondering i there is a way to see this info and/or to force the usage of the SILK codec over G729. 

Thanks again, 

Dominic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug, Yes, I&#8217;ve seen that the SILK_V3 codec works (and very well at that!) for the Skype to Skype calls. However, for the SkypeOut calls, I&#8217;m stuck in G729 and cannot see the relays/UDP stats in the technical info screen. I&#8217;m just wondering i there is a way to see this info and/or to force the usage of the SILK codec over G729. </p>
<p>Thanks again, </p>
<p>Dominic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-100962</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-100962</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Dominic. Note that because this slideshow is quite old, Skype has come out with much newer and better codecs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Dominic. Note that because this slideshow is quite old, Skype has come out with much newer and better codecs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic Fugere</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-100615</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic Fugere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-100615</guid>
		<description>Hello Mr aye, 

Thank you very much for this very thorough tutorial (and the forum replies to it spanning more than 4 years!). I&#039;m amazed at not only the amount of information it contains but, moreover, the simple yet entertaining way that info i presented. You certainly have a knack for radio ;) This being said, I am winderin it the relays/UDP stuff you mention is only for Skype-to-Skype calls as (lie Richie mentioned in posts 90 and 91), I can only get the G729 codec in my SkypeOut calls without indication on the remote UDP or the Relays line in the Tech Info window. 

Thanks again, 

Dominic</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Mr aye, </p>
<p>Thank you very much for this very thorough tutorial (and the forum replies to it spanning more than 4 years!). I&#8217;m amazed at not only the amount of information it contains but, moreover, the simple yet entertaining way that info i presented. You certainly have a knack for radio <img src='http://www.blogarithms.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  This being said, I am winderin it the relays/UDP stuff you mention is only for Skype-to-Skype calls as (lie Richie mentioned in posts 90 and 91), I can only get the G729 codec in my SkypeOut calls without indication on the remote UDP or the Relays line in the Tech Info window. </p>
<p>Thanks again, </p>
<p>Dominic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98248</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 05:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98248</guid>
		<description>Ben2011: If there&#039;s no firewall, then the holes aren&#039;t necessary. (There&#039;s no where to poke them.) And yes, the holes may help even if the other person is on a phone. The only way to know is to open the Technical Call Info window and see the number of Relays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben2011: If there&#8217;s no firewall, then the holes aren&#8217;t necessary. (There&#8217;s no where to poke them.) And yes, the holes may help even if the other person is on a phone. The only way to know is to open the Technical Call Info window and see the number of Relays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funde auf delicious fuer den Zeitraum Juli 12th bis August 4th &#171; Podcasting for Learning</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98213</link>
		<dc:creator>Funde auf delicious fuer den Zeitraum Juli 12th bis August 4th &#171; Podcasting for Learning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 16:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98213</guid>
		<description>[...] Blogarithms &#187; Skype for Interviews &#8211; A How-To Video &#8211; Annotated link http://www.diigo.com/bookmark/http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blogarithms &raquo; Skype for Interviews &ndash; A How-To Video &#8211; Annotated link <a href="http://www.diigo.com/bookmark/http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews" rel="nofollow">http://www.diigo.com/bookmark/http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben2011</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98186</link>
		<dc:creator>ben2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98186</guid>
		<description>also, does the &quot;poking holes&quot; help at all if one person is on a regular telephone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also, does the &#8220;poking holes&#8221; help at all if one person is on a regular telephone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ben2011</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98184</link>
		<dc:creator>ben2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 04:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98184</guid>
		<description>would just connecting the computer directly to the cable modem negate any need to &quot;poke holes&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would just connecting the computer directly to the cable modem negate any need to &#8220;poke holes&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Kaye</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98175</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98175</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re already on a cable internet connection you won&#039;t see any improvement with an even faster connection. The video is still accurate except (a) the way you get to the technical call information window is different in the new UI, and (b) the new codec is even better than the one we recommended when we produced the slideshow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re already on a cable internet connection you won&#8217;t see any improvement with an even faster connection. The video is still accurate except (a) the way you get to the technical call information window is different in the new UI, and (b) the new codec is even better than the one we recommended when we produced the slideshow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben2011</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98171</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98171</guid>
		<description>also..is this video still fairly up to date?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also..is this video still fairly up to date?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben2011</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/comment-page-3/#comment-98170</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben2011</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2007/12/23/skype-for-interviews/#comment-98170</guid>
		<description>Should switching to a wideband internet which is purpotedly much faster (I currently have the regular Time Warner Cable internet) make a significant difference in the clarity of the calls?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should switching to a wideband internet which is purpotedly much faster (I currently have the regular Time Warner Cable internet) make a significant difference in the clarity of the calls?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

