<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comcast&#8217;s One-DVD-per-Day Limit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/08/29/comcasts-limit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/08/29/comcasts-limit/</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/08/29/comcasts-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-66086</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 20:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/?p=764#comment-66086</guid>
		<description>This is very concerning.  I am a developer and work online all day, every day.  I only have two broadband choices, Comcast and ATT DSL (which I&#039;ve tried and is about as fast as a dialup connection.)

Comcast is being pretty unrealistic, considering the wave of social networking and online gaming increasing popularity.  Comcast&#039;s own web offerings are extremely heavy in bandwidth, are they going to no track anything within their own netwrok?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very concerning.  I am a developer and work online all day, every day.  I only have two broadband choices, Comcast and ATT DSL (which I&#8217;ve tried and is about as fast as a dialup connection.)</p>
<p>Comcast is being pretty unrealistic, considering the wave of social networking and online gaming increasing popularity.  Comcast&#8217;s own web offerings are extremely heavy in bandwidth, are they going to no track anything within their own netwrok?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/08/29/comcasts-limit/comment-page-1/#comment-65653</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/?p=764#comment-65653</guid>
		<description>Doug,

I agree that this is a major problem and goes way beyond Comcast. I&#039;m sure other IPs are looking at this and to see if Comcast sticks with this policy. For some who have a choice in IPs, there will be no real choice if they all are allowed to head in this direction.

I wrote up my thoughts about this on my blog. http://fogview.com/index.php?post_id=372895

-Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug,</p>
<p>I agree that this is a major problem and goes way beyond Comcast. I&#8217;m sure other IPs are looking at this and to see if Comcast sticks with this policy. For some who have a choice in IPs, there will be no real choice if they all are allowed to head in this direction.</p>
<p>I wrote up my thoughts about this on my blog. <a href="http://fogview.com/index.php?post_id=372895" rel="nofollow">http://fogview.com/index.php?post_id=372895</a></p>
<p>-Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

