<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Push That Button!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/23/dontpush/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/23/dontpush/</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye&#039;s Weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 17:38:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cori</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/23/dontpush/comment-page-1/#comment-88933</link>
		<dc:creator>cori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 05:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/?p=1265#comment-88933</guid>
		<description>Refreshingly open and honest, as always, Doug.

I 2nd Thilo&#039;s comment: the rule I&#039;ve always heard and have actually grokked is &quot;always test *all* your backups&quot; but even after having been burned by bad backups in the past I still don&#039;t practice it religiously.  I figure it&#039;s a combination of the relief and exhaustion you feel when the restore is finally running again and the absolute last thing you want to do is test more backups and the hole-in-the-roof problem when you don&#039;t think about testing the backups unless you&#039;re having a backup problem.

Glad everything&#039;s back up, though!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refreshingly open and honest, as always, Doug.</p>
<p>I 2nd Thilo&#8217;s comment: the rule I&#8217;ve always heard and have actually grokked is &#8220;always test *all* your backups&#8221; but even after having been burned by bad backups in the past I still don&#8217;t practice it religiously.  I figure it&#8217;s a combination of the relief and exhaustion you feel when the restore is finally running again and the absolute last thing you want to do is test more backups and the hole-in-the-roof problem when you don&#8217;t think about testing the backups unless you&#8217;re having a backup problem.</p>
<p>Glad everything&#8217;s back up, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thilo</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2009/10/23/dontpush/comment-page-1/#comment-88931</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 10:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/?p=1265#comment-88931</guid>
		<description>&gt; (1) backup copy appeared to be corrupted
&gt; (2) script that copied the backups to S3 hadn’t run successfully since January 30, 2009.

That seems to happen a lot.
We have lost two months worth of Subversion commits that way. 

Since no one cares about backups until you need them, no one bothers to monitor the backup scripts (and no one practices the recovery procedures either), and according to Murphy, automated processes fail as soon as you stop watching them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; (1) backup copy appeared to be corrupted<br />
&gt; (2) script that copied the backups to S3 hadn’t run successfully since January 30, 2009.</p>
<p>That seems to happen a lot.<br />
We have lost two months worth of Subversion commits that way. </p>
<p>Since no one cares about backups until you need them, no one bothers to monitor the backup scripts (and no one practices the recovery procedures either), and according to Murphy, automated processes fail as soon as you stop watching them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

