<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Blogarithms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogarithms.com</link>
	<description>Doug Kaye's Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>LifeCasting Goes Pro</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/13/lifecasting-goes-pro/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/13/lifecasting-goes-pro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 19:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/?p=725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idea of LifeCasting (informal very-long format live video) probably started with Justin.tv and was then built on by Chris Pirillo. I found it particularly fascinating during last year&#8217;s iPhone launch, covered by Robert Scoble and others, but generally just a curious phenomenon. For a few years now, a number of people have wondered what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of LifeCasting (informal very-long format live video) probably started with <a href="http://http://www.justin.tv/">Justin.tv</a> and was then built on by <a href="http://chris.pirillo.com/">Chris Pirillo</a>. I found it particularly fascinating during last year&#8217;s iPhone launch, covered by Robert Scoble and others, but generally just a curious phenomenon. For a few years now, a number of people have wondered what would happen if you were to marry media professionals with this technology. That&#8217;s essentially what we&#8217;ve done with spoken-word audio on The Conversations Network, and the opportunity for a live, pro-quality video network is something I&#8217;ve wanted to see or do for a long time.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s here. At <a href="http://twitlive.tv/">TWiTLive.com</a>, Leo Laporte is streaming 25 hours per week via (for now) <a href="http://www.stickam.com/">Stickam</a>. Leo&#8217;s video is nothing more than letting us watch his many podcasts live in production: TWiT, Security Now, Net@Nite, etc. It&#8217;s still rough around the edges &#8212; only one camera is running so far &#8212; but it&#8217;s already very entertaining. They key is that Leo, as always, transcends the technology. He&#8217;s committed to the same broadcast quality he brings to audio podcasting. It&#8217;s not just his own professionalism, but the production values as well: excellent content and guests, good lighting, good video and (of course) excellent audio. The low-quality audio from most LifeCasters is irritating and tiring. I can leave Leo&#8217;s show running all day.</p>
<p>In fact, I already do leave Leo&#8217;s show running all day. I work in a home office, and until recently I&#8217;ve always had CNN or MSNBC on the TV while I work except when I&#8217;m recording or mixing audio. I&#8217;m not sure why. Maybe I just miss having other humans around the workplace.  Well now I have Leo and his guests to keep me company, and it&#8217;s great. Just as TWiT will be remembered as an audio podcast milestone, TWiTLive is already a breakthrough in streaming video. It leverages everything Leo has done during his distinguished career. It&#8217;s not the rebirth of TechTV, it&#8217;s something much better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/13/lifecasting-goes-pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Look for IT Conversations</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/08/new-look-for-it-conversations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/08/new-look-for-it-conversations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/08/new-look-for-it-conversations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;ve just turned on a new page layout for IT Conversations. Lots of Ajax and widgets have helped us reduce the size of the pages and improve performance and at the same time increase the functionality. You may need to snoop around to find your favorite features, but they&#8217;re all there along with some new [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve just turned on a new page layout for <a href="http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org">IT Conversations</a>. Lots of Ajax and widgets have helped us reduce the size of the pages and improve performance and at the same time increase the functionality. You may need to snoop around to find your favorite features, but they&#8217;re all there along with some new ones. New looks for our other channels will follow shortly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/08/new-look-for-it-conversations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our New Board Members</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/03/our-new-board-members/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/03/our-new-board-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 07:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/03/our-new-board-members/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week was the annual meeting of the Board of Directors of The Conversations Network at which we elected two new board members, Jon Udell and Zephyr Teachout. Along with our re-elected directors, Jake Shapiro and David Weinberger, I think you&#8217;ll agree it&#8217;s an extraordinary team. And then there&#8217;s our Board of Advisors. That&#8217;s a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week was the annual meeting of the Board of Directors of The Conversations Network at which we elected two new board members, <a href="http://blog.jonudell.net/">Jon Udell</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zephyr_Teachout">Zephyr Teachout</a>. Along with our re-elected directors, <a href="http://www.jakeshapiro.com/">Jake Shapiro</a> and <a href="http://www.hyperorg.com/blogger/">David Weinberger</a>, I think you&#8217;ll agree it&#8217;s an extraordinary team. And then there&#8217;s our <a href="http://www.conversationsnetwork.org/contacts/">Board of Advisors</a>. That&#8217;s a lot of talent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/03/our-new-board-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My New Widget Architecture</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/my-new-widget-architecture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/my-new-widget-architecture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/my-new-widget-architecture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was chatting with David Marks of Loomia about the version 4 rewrite of The Conversations Network&#8217;s web sites, and he asked whether I&#8217;d blogged about it. Haven&#8217;t yet, so here&#8217;s part of it&#8230;
The new sites will be extremely dynamic with nearly everything loaded at runtime via Ajax widgets, some nested within other widgets, sometimes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was chatting with David Marks of <a href="http://loomia.com">Loomia</a> about the version 4 rewrite of The Conversations Network&#8217;s web sites, and he asked whether I&#8217;d blogged about it. Haven&#8217;t yet, so here&#8217;s part of it&#8230;</p>
<p>The new sites will be extremely dynamic with nearly everything loaded at runtime via Ajax widgets, some nested within other widgets, sometimes three-deep. Even with all the HTTP requests, the pages are so much simpler and built with so many fewer lines of code, the new site is noticeably faster.</p>
<p>Placing a widget on a page is about as simple as it gets. For example, the following HTML is all it takes to display the most-popular recently published shows for a channel:</p>
<blockquote><p>&lt;div class=&#8221;cnWidget mostPopularRecent&#8221;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</p></blockquote>
<p>My widgetLoader looks for &lt;div&gt; elements with className &#8216;cnWidget&#8217;. In the above case it then makes a prototype.js Ajax call to /widget/mostPopularRecent (which is rewritten to mostPopularRecent.php in our case), which then returns the content of the &lt;div&gt;. Dirt simple!</p>
<p>For widgets that require arguments, I just include the values as a Json string within the &lt;div&gt; such as:</p>
<blockquote><p>&lt;div class=&#8221;cnWidget selectedTopics&#8221; style=&#8221;display:none&#8221;&gt;<br />
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;["software","blogging","opensource","security"]<br />
&lt;/div&gt;</p></blockquote>
<p>Redesigning the pages takes nothing more than moving the widgets around and changing the CSS. And in version 4.1 I hope to have a drag-and-drop tool for adding and moving widgets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/my-new-widget-architecture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering Tom LeVine</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/remembering-tom-levine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/remembering-tom-levine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 23:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/remembering-tom-levine/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was saddened to return home today after an east-coast trip to be greeted with the news that Tom LeVine had died from a brain tumor diagnosed only two months ago. Tom was the CEO of Pop!Tech, a marvelous annual event held in Maine every year. IT Conversations streamed live audio from Pop!Tech 2004 and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was saddened to return home today after an east-coast trip to be greeted with the news that <a href="http://poptech.org/tom/">Tom LeVine</a> had died from a brain tumor diagnosed only two months ago. Tom was the CEO of <a href="http://poptech.org/">Pop!Tech</a>, a marvelous annual event held in Maine every year. IT Conversations <a href="http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/series/poptech2005.html">streamed live audio</a> from Pop!Tech 2004 and 2005 thanks to Tom&#8217;s believe in our mutual missions.</p>
<p>I first met Tom about 13 years ago when he was working in venture capital. We worked together to start an online business, but it never happened. Years later, Tom and I were both happy the project never got off the ground for a variety of reasons. We remained friends and sometimes shared a meal when he was in the Bay Area. As the Pop!Tech announcement says, Tom was one of those incredibly healthy and active people we all figure would outlive the rest of us. Alas, he passed away at the age of 56. He is already missed, and will be for some time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/05/01/remembering-tom-levine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An IDE for PHP: Zend? Eclipse?</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/an-ide-for-php-zend-eclipse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/an-ide-for-php-zend-eclipse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/an-ide-for-php-zend-eclipse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m thinking about switching from just using a text editor to an IDE, but I need some help. I went to the Zend web site and became thoroughly confused. So many versions. With and without Eclipse. (I&#8217;ve never used Eclipse, either.)
Help me out here. What package(s) do I want and why? Download Eclipse separately? Multiple [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thinking about switching from just using a text editor to an IDE, but I need some help. I went to the Zend web site and became thoroughly confused. So many versions. With and without Eclipse. (I&#8217;ve never used Eclipse, either.)</p>
<p>Help me out here. What package(s) do I want and why? Download Eclipse separately? Multiple versions of that, too. TIA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/an-ide-for-php-zend-eclipse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IT Conversations RSS Feeds Moved</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/itcrssmoved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/itcrssmoved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 14:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/itcrssmoved/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to the split with GigaVox Media, we were forced to move the primary feed for IT Conversations. It appears that only two-thirds of the RSS clients are responding to the redirect. So if you haven&#8217;t received any IT Conversations programs for the past week, check your podcatcher. The new URL for the IT Conversations [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to the split with GigaVox Media, we were forced to move the primary feed for IT Conversations. It appears that only two-thirds of the RSS clients are responding to the redirect. So if you haven&#8217;t received any IT Conversations programs for the past week, check your podcatcher. The new URL for the IT Conversations RSS feed is <a href="http://feeds.conversationsnetwork.org/channel/itc">http://feeds.conversationsnetwork.org/channel/itc</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blogarithms.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/itcrssstats.png" title="itcrssstats.png"><img src="http://www.blogarithms.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/itcrssstats.png" alt="itcrssstats.png" /></a></p>
<p>And in case you missed it, check out our new <a href="http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/channelFeeds.html">Premium Edition</a> RSS feeds &#8212; without the promos, pitches and music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/29/itcrssmoved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software Development in the 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/software-development-in-the-21st-century/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/software-development-in-the-21st-century/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/software-development-in-the-21st-century/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s nothing unusual about my experiences, but I wonder if people in other industries realize how fundamentally the Internet has changed how software is developed. In my case, it&#8217;s software for and on the Internet itself, so the development environment is also the distribution platform. (That wasn&#8217;t always the case. Yes, there was software before [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing unusual about my experiences, but I wonder if people in other industries realize how fundamentally the Internet has changed how software is developed. In my case, it&#8217;s software for and on the Internet itself, so the development environment is also the distribution platform. (That wasn&#8217;t always the case. Yes, there was software before the Internet.) Just consider what happened this morning.</p>
<ul>
<li>We released a new feature, <a href="http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/slideshows/">Slideshows</a>.</li>
<li>A few minutes later, Paul Figgiani reported a bug when using Safari. Instant QA.</li>
<li>I used Twitter to ask &#8220;Are there any tools for debugging JavaScript and the DOM under Safari?&#8221;</li>
<li>Phil Windley and <span class="fn">Coty Rosenblath replied within three minutes.</span></li>
<li><span class="fn">With their suggestions, I found the problem five minutes later.</span></li>
<li><span class="fn">Not knowing why my code didn&#8217;t work on Safari, I asked The Google about &#8220;xml load in safari&#8221; and found an explanation seconds later.</span></li>
<li><span class="fn">I coded a fix, tested it and published it via Subversion to our public servers a few minutes later.</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Elapsed time from bug report to fix: less that 20 minutes. Okay, so that&#8217;s not unusual. We&#8217;ve all fixed bugs that quickly. But I never opened a book. I used a tool (Safari developer tools) I&#8217;d never even heard of. I learned and deployed a workaround to a browser-specific issue I knew nothing about. And I had support from three other people located in different timezones in near real time and for free. Without the Internet, this process would likely have taken weeks and a relatively formal QA process: test, document, research &#8212; and how would I have ever found the solution? &#8212; fix, test, release. Rapid development is an understatement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/software-development-in-the-21st-century/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than Video: Slideshows</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/slideshows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/slideshows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/slideshows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We get many requests for videos of conference sessions in addition to MP3 files. Virtually every time we ask why, it&#8217;s because people want to see the slides. Most of the online conference videos you see are some combination of a presenter standing at a podium and blurry shots of a projection screen. What people [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We get many requests for videos of conference sessions in addition to MP3 files. Virtually every time we ask why, it&#8217;s because people want to see the slides. Most of the online conference videos you see are some combination of a presenter standing at a podium and blurry shots of a projection screen. What people really want is a high-resolution slideshow with synchronized audio. You asked for it; we did it.</p>
<p>Today, The Conversations Network published our first slideshow from a third-party conference. For no particular reason other than our internal production schedule, it&#8217;s the presentation by <a href="http://itc.conversationsnetwork.org/shows/detail3498.html">Jane McGonigal</a>, Lead Game Designer at Institute for the Future, at last year&#8217;s O&#8217;Reilly Media Emerging Technology Conference (ETech). Let us know what you think. And expect a lot more slideshow-versions of programs as we&#8217;re able to get access to presenters&#8217; PowerPoint and Keynote files.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/27/slideshows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Value of Ratings</title>
		<link>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/26/the-value-of-ratings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/26/the-value-of-ratings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Kaye</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/26/the-value-of-ratings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re in the process of re-evaluating our use of explicit ratings on The Conversations Network, so I just did an analysis of our rating activity. Interesting.

Total ratings to date: 65, 881
Mean per episode: 38.5
Median: 17
Most-rated episode: 1,041 ratings
Episodes rated per day: 60
Ratings made per day: 78
Distribution

Episodes with only 1 rating: 70
Episodes with 2 ratings: 77
Episodes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re in the process of re-evaluating our use of explicit ratings on The Conversations Network, so I just did an analysis of our rating activity. Interesting.</p>
<ul>
<li>Total ratings to date: 65, 881</li>
<li>Mean per episode: 38.5</li>
<li>Median: 17</li>
<li>Most-rated episode: 1,041 ratings</li>
<li>Episodes rated per day: 60</li>
<li>Ratings made per day: 78</li>
<li>Distribution
<ul>
<li>Episodes with only 1 rating: 70</li>
<li>Episodes with 2 ratings: 77</li>
<li>Episodes with 3 ratings: 95</li>
<li>Episodes with 4 ratings: 61</li>
<li>Episodes with 5 or more ratings: 1,410</li>
<li>40 most-rated episodes: &gt;200 ratings each</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>The numbers tell us that ratings aren&#8217;t terribly useful in the short term such as to understand the quality of episodes published within the past week, but they are quite valuable for the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.blogarithms.com/index.php/archives/2008/03/26/the-value-of-ratings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
